Critique of Jefferson and Hamilton Essay - 558 Words

Different people have different outlooks on how the nation should be ran and how our economy should produce our money. For instance two great presidents have two different outlooks on how our economy and our politics should work. Thomas Jefferson wanted an economy based on small family owned farms, while Hamilton on the other hand wanted to manufacturer and produce as much as possible in factories. Both of their plans for the economy have many strong points, but they also have some weak points. Many small towns and families make their living off of their family farms. Yes, this may be a great way of living for these families, but would it really be able to support a nation? Thomas Jeffersons idea of how a nation should be ran†¦show more content†¦This extensive drawn out plan he created listed everything he desired to do, from the labor to the employment to the securing a steady demand. Hamilton tried to promote diversity in the society, he also tried to get men to bring out their own talents that make them unique, and every man has something else to offer to promote new things in the society. Even the women and children were made more useful in his plan, he found a place for everyone to be apart of this new nation. It is made evident that Hamiltion had the future of America in his mind when he drew up this plan. The future of America relies on manufacturing and Hamilton realized that, the future could of never surrived on just farming, there was just too many improvements to do. Think if we didnt have manufaturing, that would mean no telephones, no cars, and no means of communition unless you wanted to walk over to whom evers house you had to talk to. Without someone manufactuing water purifiers we wouldnt have clean water, which means there would be many more dieases and deaths. Just fruits and vegetables alone wouldnt of cut if down the road, people would of got sick of them easily. Jefferson thought of the one main necessity in life, food, but he didnt think of how to improve the quality of life in America. While Hamilton on the other hand, took time to draw out his detailed plan on how to put his plan into attack, he also included everyone in his society. Though the plans differShow MoreRelatedAlien And Sedition Acts Dbq1456 Words   |  6 PagesSophia Jefferson Mr. Carpenter AP US History 12.14.15 Alien and Sedition Acts DBQ The 1780’s and 1790’s were a time of growing contentions in America, and were capped off with the creation of the Alien and Sedition acts. The Alien and Sedition acts included four laws that made it extremely difficult to be an immigrant in the United States. These laws allowed the president to deport any immigrant he deemed dangerous or suspicious, allowed the government to remove immigrants in time of war and alsoRead MoreHow Democratic Is The American Constitution Essay1616 Words   |  7 Pagesits drafting, to its ideology, to its relevance. By analyzing Dahl’s critiques of the Constitution in terms of the parallels that exist between factions and the two-party system, the issue of unequal representation, and the necessity for the Framers to compromise on their ideals to ratify the Constitution, Dahl defined a clear argument based in his general disapproval for the Constitution. However, by combining Dahl’s critiques with potential rebuttals from t he opinions and perspectives of MadisonRead MoreFounding Brothers9626 Words   |  39 PagesRepublicanism view on history claims the revolution to be a liberation movement from everything British, and dislike the take-over of the Federalists (moneymen) in 1790 of which Hamilton was the Chief Culprit The alternative interpretation views Washington, Adams, and Hamilton as the heirs to the revolutionary legacy and Jefferson as the chief culprit. This view is more collectivistic rather than individualistic. The book will look at this time in history through several stories that show us theRead MoreJames Madison : The Founding Father Of Our Nation1519 Words   |  7 Pagesmember advisory council to the Virginia governor in 1777 (9). His diligence was very apparent during his time on the council, and gave him the opportunity to â€Å"hone his political skills† (10). Thomas Jefferson became governor in 1779, and a life-long friendship with Madison was set in motion (10). Jefferson was impressed by Madison’s â€Å"intelligence, public-spiritedness, and willingness to serve† (10). Madison also impressed many elite Virginia politicians because of his â€Å"work ethic† (11). Madison hadRead MoreFirst Bank of the United States4267 Words   |  18 Pagesdesigned to make money and build an economy. It was designed by men like Alexander Hamilton and Robert Morris, but did not benefit the common citizen as much as wealthy investors. Why did a fledgling government nee d to borrow millions from overseas in order to invest in a â€Å"national† bank, to turn around and then borrow the same money back and pay interest on it? The banking system developed by Alexander Hamilton and Robert Morris was prime pickings for speculators, and laid the groundwork for aRead MoreThe United States : The Independent Minds Of Its People1532 Words   |  7 Pagesarisen between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. At his inauguration in 1789, George Washington appointed Alexander Hamilton as the first Secretary of the Treasury (U.S. Department of Treasury). His first task in his new position was to setup an accepted federal economic system that would both unite the country and gain control over the sporadic debt that was amassed during the war. It was not so much this task that caused an interjection of disapproval from Jefferson as much as it was his wayRead MoreFederalism Is A System Of Government1699 Words   |  7 PagesConstitution was The Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers 85 anonymous essays published in New York City to persuade the people of the state to vote for those laws to be in the ratification of the constitution. These articles were written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison and with the help of John Jay. examined the benefits of the new, proposed Constitution, and analyzed the political theory and function behind the various articles of the Constitution. The Federalist Papers remains one of the mostRead MoreThe Supreme Court Struck Down The Mccain Feingold Act844 Words   |  4 Pagesdefending the constitution. With political participation rates extremely low, especially in local elections, there is little political capital and power among the electorate. The power of the people can be superior to both the legislative and judiciary (Hamilton Fed 78), but a belief persists that political participation does not matter because of the money involved in politics. People are disenchanted with the judiciary and legislative; citizens deserve a method to hold these branches accountable. â€Å"I amRead MoreThe Good Ghanaian Society 1068 Words   |  5 Pagespreserves as much as possible the conditions of liberty and equality that humankind enjoyed in the ‘state of nature’. To Adam Smith, it has nearly absolute economic freedom. To Thomas Jefferson, it consists of people who live in small- scale, rural communities characterized by high quality of life. To Alexander Hamilton, it consists of people who live in modern industrial cities characterized by a high standard of living. To Marx, it has nearly absolute economic equality. To John S. Mill, it allowsRead MoreConstitutional Interpretation Essay1012 Words   |  5 PagesConstitutional Interpretation In this essay I will try to explain and critique the two dominant methods of constitutional interpretation. Which are originalism and non-originalism. I will do this by taking help from â€Å"How to Read the Constitution† by Christopher Wolfe, and different source’s from Internet. I will start by giving what Wolfe says originalism is, and then I will give some background to other ways to interpret the constitution, and the founders and interpretation and I will finish